The CE marking stands for the French term "Conformité Européenne," meaning "European Conformity." When a manufacturer affixes the CE mark to a product, it indicates that the manufacturer declares the product complies with all applicable EU regulations.

The current exemptions are still under review. Please refer to the recommendation report published in February 2009 by the Oeko-Institut (German Institute for Applied Ecology), which is available on the European Commission’s RoHS website. The European Commission has not yet formally adopted the proposed expiry dates in the report.

The definition of "risk" has not yet been finalized in the RoHS 2.0 directive and is still under discussion in the European Parliament and Council.

Manufacturers are not required to retroactively ensure compliance for EEE products already on the market. However, distributors should avoid selling products that may not comply with RoHS requirements.

Yes. CE marking applies to both B2B (business-to-business) and B2C (business-to-consumer) products.

If it is not possible to include the information directly on the product, it must be provided on the packaging or in accompanying documentation.

No, only finished products require CE marking.

Jill Evans, who proposed the RoHS revision, suggested banning PVC in her report. However, PVC may not be included in the final list of restricted substances in RoHS 2.0.

The manufacturer determines which risk assessment procedures to use and how to evaluate suppliers.

RoHS 2 requires the name and address of the importer.

The earliest possible announcement date was expected in the second quarter of 2011. No official announcement date or document number had been released at that time.

Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) can collect supplier self-declaration data by verifying the BOM.

The 14 new SVHC substances were included in October 2009.

Yes.

Defense or military equipment remains excluded under RoHS 2.

Yes.

No. RoHS 2 is based on self-declaration.

There should be a website listing complete information on products requiring CE marking. Currently, aerospace products and end items do not require CE marking.

CE marking applies to all electrical and electronic equipment within the scope of RoHS 2.

This is still under discussion. The Parliament aims to remove the exemption for large-scale stationary industrial tools, while the Council prefers to maintain the exclusion.

No. RoHS 2 is primarily based on self-declaration.

We recommend starting preparations immediately for CE marking requirements under RoHS 2.

RoHS 2 only requires the first importer placing the product on the EU market to provide their name and address on the product.

No. A product must comply with all applicable directives in order to bear the CE mark.

An electronic version of the RoHS 2 draft is available on the European Commission’s RoHS website.

No. Only finished products require CE marking.

An annual update of the risk assessment process is recommended.

There are four similarities between China’s “Measures” and the EU RoHS Directive:

1. Both are legally normative documents;
2. The main purpose of both is to control (restrict and reduce) the use of toxic and hazardous substances in electrical and electronic products;
3. Both involve trade activities (goods trade);
4. The restricted substances are the same six substances: lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenyls (PBB), and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE).

There are seven differences between China’s “Measures” and the EU RoHS Directive:

1. China’s “Measures” can be directly implemented without being converted into lower-level legal instruments; however, the EU RoHS Directive must be transposed into the laws/regulations of EU Member States before implementation.
2. China’s “Measures” apply to electronic information products, while the EU RoHS Directive applies to electrical and electronic equipment with AC voltage not exceeding 1000V and DC voltage not exceeding 1500V (excluding medical devices, monitoring and control instruments for now).
3. China’s “Measures” adopt a “comprehensive inclusion” approach for all electronic information products containing hazardous substances, while the EU RoHS Directive applies mainly to finished electrical and electronic equipment, with requirements for components/materials being indirectly passed through the final product. Therefore, China’s approach is direct restriction, whereas the EU approach is indirect.
4. China adopts a catalogue-based regulatory system for hazardous substances, formed using an “exhaustive listing” method. The EU RoHS Directive first includes eight categories of WEEE products, and then exempts products where substitution is not yet technically or economically feasible through an exemption mechanism.
5. China’s “Measures” were issued on February 28, 2006 and implemented on March 1, 2007, with the restriction timeline for hazardous substances not yet determined. The EU RoHS timeline is: Directive issued on February 13, 2003; transposed into Member State law by August 13, 2004; implemented from July 1, 2006. Therefore, EU implementation is earlier than China’s.
6. China’s “Measures” require both standards and a catalogue for implementation; the catalogue relies on supporting standards. The EU RoHS Directive only requires supporting standards.
7. China adopts a “two-step” approach: first, self-declaration of environmental information is required; second, products listed in the key management catalogue are subject to strict control, substitution or compliance with limit values, and must pass compulsory certification (3C) before market entry. The EU RoHS Directive relies on self-declaration, but requires immediate compliance with limit values (“one-step” approach).

The Ministry of Information Industry published the “Classification Notes for Electronic Information Products” based on the national statistical classification directory after the Measures were issued. This document provides detailed definitions and explanations of electronic information products. With this reference, manufacturers can easily determine whether their products fall within the scope of “electronic information products.” The document is available on the Ministry’s website.

The FAQ provides criteria for determining whether products fall within the scope of WEEE and RoHS, but it is not a product classification standard. It is intended to assist manufacturers in evaluation. However, responsibility for determining applicability lies with manufacturers who are best able to assess their own products. If there are questions, manufacturers may consult the relevant national authorities. Under the legal basis of the RoHS Directive, Member States may not add additional product categories without prior notification to the European Commission.

Catalogue management is a regulatory approach defined in the Measures, differing from the EU RoHS Directive. It targets electronic information products known to contain six hazardous substances. When substitution or compliance is technically and economically feasible, the products are included in the catalogue. The catalogue is developed gradually through procedures such as consultation with enterprises and expert evaluation. A draft procedure document has been prepared to standardize the process.

After establishing procedural regulations for catalogue development, the Ministry of Information Industry will carry out preparatory work. The process will be institutionalized, standardized, and transparent. Opinions from enterprises, industry associations, experts, and government authorities will be widely collected to ensure scientific and accurate decision-making.

The control of hazardous substances in electronic information products under the “Measures” indeed follows a “two-step approach.” The “first step,” upon the implementation (effective date) of the Measures, requires that all electronic information products containing hazardous substances entering the market only need to provide “disclosure” (self-declaration). This means labeling or providing information in product manuals to inform users or consumers of the names and contents of hazardous substances or elements in the product, environmental usage period, recyclability at end-of-life, and packaging material information. At this stage, there are no requirements for substitution or concentration limits. The “second step” applies when certain products are included in the Catalogue. These products must either have substituted hazardous substances or meet limit standards, and must pass CCC certification before entering the market.

The Measures clearly adopt a “catalogue management” approach for restricting and prohibiting hazardous substances. Only products included in the Catalogue are required to undergo CCC certification. Therefore, when the Measures first take effect, products not included in the Catalogue do not require CCC certification. The inclusion of products in the Catalogue is a gradual process, allowing enterprises sufficient preparation time. CCC certification for listed products will inevitably increase costs, which is an unavoidable cost of environmental protection, but this applies equally to all enterprises, whether domestic or foreign, manufacturers or importers.

The issuance date refers to the official publication date of the Measures, after which no further revisions or consultations will be made. The implementation date is when the legal effect begins; from that date, all provisions take effect except those related to the Catalogue. The timeline for restricting hazardous substances in Catalogue-listed products has not yet been determined. Article 21 states that the implementation timeline will be jointly issued by relevant authorities based on industrial development conditions. Therefore, the enforcement timing for Catalogue products has not been finalized in the Measures.

The Ministry of Information Industry began developing pollution control standards for electronic information products in 2004. The approach includes actively tracking and participating in international standard development, completing national standards for hazardous substance testing procedures, and developing industry standards. China has participated in IEC/TC111 activities and established corresponding technical working groups. Eight industry standards have been initiated, including limit requirements, labeling requirements, testing methods, and lead-free soldering standards. Three standards (SJ/T 11363-2006, SJ/T 11364-2006, SJ/T 11365-2006) have already been issued, while others are still under development. The standardization process is open, transparent, and aligned with international standards.

Standard development follows strict procedures and is open to enterprises and institutions. The working group has expanded from over 20 members to more than 100. The goal is to align with international standards and ensure future compatibility with global requirements.

The Measures are a ministerial regulation jointly issued by seven government authorities. They include requirements for environmental labeling and restrictions on hazardous substances. The Labeling Requirements and Limit Requirements are supporting standards developed based on the Measures, further refining and specifying implementation details. Although these standards are recommended in nature, they become mandatory due to their incorporation into the Measures.

The industry standards developed by the working group support the implementation of the Measures. Standards issued by the General Administration of Quality Supervision are industry standards used mainly to support export testing for EU RoHS compliance. National standards developed by the Standardization Administration aim to meet domestic industry needs and include technical guidance documents. These efforts are coordinated to avoid duplication and ensure consistency.

The Measures introduce the concept of environmentally friendly product design and production. They require compliance with relevant standards and encourage the use of non-toxic or low-toxicity materials and recyclable solutions where technically feasible. However, these provisions are advisory in nature and do not impose mandatory enforcement measures.

“White goods” generally refer to household appliances such as refrigerators, washing machines, and air conditioners. “Black goods” refer to consumer electronics such as televisions, radios, audio/video equipment, and speakers. So far, white goods are not officially classified as electronic information products by the national statistics authority and are therefore not included in the scope of the Measures. “Home electronic products” refer to traditional black goods only. Although complete white goods are excluded, some electronic components within them are considered electronic information products. If these components are supplied directly for assembly purposes, they are not subject to the Measures; however, if sold separately, they must comply with the Measures.

The RoHS Directive applies only to products placed on the market. Therefore, products manufactured for internal use are not covered. However, once placed on the market, compliance is required.

Electronic products specifically supplied directly to automobile manufacturers for assembly are not subject to the Measures. However, electronic information products sold separately that can be used in automotive applications are within the scope of the Measures.

Spare parts used for maintenance or upgrades in after-sales service are not subject to the Administrative Measures. However, if they are sold as standalone products, they fall within the scope of the Measures.

Radar is an electronic information product. Therefore, radar products fall under the scope of the Administrative Measures, except for military radar.

Although batteries are not included under the EU RoHS Directive, the EU has a separate Battery Directive. In Mainland China, battery products listed in the Classification Notes must comply with the Administrative Measures; those not listed are not subject to the Measures.

The “electronic application products” in the Classification Notes include “household electronics” and “medical electronic devices and equipment.” Therefore, medical electronic devices and equipment listed in the Classification Notes are considered electronic information products and must comply with the Administrative Measures.

Electronic industrial equipment explicitly listed in the Classification Notes falls under the scope of the Administrative Measures and must comply with its requirements. Such products placed on the market after March 1, 2007 must also be labeled.

Currently, photocopiers are not listed in the Classification Notes and therefore are not considered electronic information products and are not subject to the Administrative Measures. The Ministry of Information Industry is revising the relevant statistical classification, and photocopiers may be included in the future.

According to the Classification Notes, consumables such as toner and ink cartridges fall under “computer peripheral products and consumables” and must comply with the Administrative Measures. Whether used in printers, photocopiers, or other similar devices, they are essentially covered. However, since photocopiers themselves are not currently within scope, consumables specifically supplied directly to photocopier manufacturers for their own use are not regulated. If sold independently, they must comply with the Measures.

Electronic measuring instruments are explicitly included in the definition of the Administrative Measures. Products listed in the Classification Notes fall under its scope and must comply with the requirements.

Blank optical discs, CDs, VCDs, DVDs, and magnetic tapes sold separately must be labeled in accordance with the Administrative Measures and the Labeling Requirements. Media that already contain recorded content and are considered software products are temporarily exempt.

Plastic, paper, or other material labels attached to electronic information products, as well as instruction manuals, may temporarily be exempt from the requirements of the Administrative Measures.

Second-hand products are not within the scope of the “Administrative Measures”.

At the current stage, products not explicitly listed in the “Classification Notes” are not considered.

The current “Administrative Measures on Pollution Control of Electronic Information Products” restricts six substances: lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenyls (PBB), and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE, except decabromodiphenyl ether), which are consistent with the EU RoHS Directive.

The phrase “other toxic and hazardous substances or elements as stipulated by the state” is a general legal expression used in mainland China’s regulatory system and is consistent in meaning with Article 5 of the EU RoHS Directive regarding “adaptation to scientific and technical progress”.

With technological development and increasing environmental requirements, it is possible that substances other than the six listed above may later be found to pose significant risks to human health and the environment, and thus require restriction. This clause is intended to allow for future additions of such substances or elements through appropriate revisions.

The environmental usage period refers specifically to the period during which hazardous substances or elements in electronic information products will not leak or mutate in a way that causes environmental pollution or serious harm to people or property.

It is not the same as the safety usage period and does not include limitations related to electrical safety or electromagnetic safety. The environmental usage period may be shorter or longer than the product’s safety usage period.

It refers to the environmental performance period under normal usage conditions, not under extreme conditions.

Manufacturers or importers independently determine the environmental usage period of their products, as they have the most knowledge of their products and can define it more scientifically.

If a company sets a longer period, it bears longer responsibility; if shorter, it may lose some market competitiveness. Therefore, the determination must be objective and scientific.

Industry associations may provide guidance for their sectors and are encouraged to develop relevant recommendations, which should be filed with the Ministry for regulatory reference.

The environmental usage period does not require government approval.

Generally, according to the “barrel principle,” the environmental usage period of a product should be determined by its weakest component.

If the product contains components that require periodic replacement and contain hazardous substances, such replaceable parts (e.g., batteries and consumables) may be labeled separately.

One of the legislative purposes of the “Administrative Measures” is to facilitate dismantling and treatment of discarded electronic information products and reduce environmental pollution.

However, the Measures regulate design, production, sales, and import activities, and do not cover post-disposal recycling, treatment, or reuse. Relevant standards supporting the Measures also do not regulate post-disposal activities.

The “market placement” time can be understood as the product’s “production date,” i.e., the date it leaves the production line.

Electronic information products produced on or after March 1, 2007 (the effective date of the Measures) must comply with the relevant requirements.

This clause is an encouraging provision and does not impose specific limit requirements on hazardous substances in packaging materials.

At present, there are no applicable national or industry standards for hazardous substance control in electronic information product packaging.

In general, processing with supplied materials or assembly refers to manufacturing finished products using imported raw materials or components for export.

Exported products and imported materials for export processing are not subject to the “Administrative Measures”.

For incoming materials processing where products are sold domestically, the products must comply with the Measures.

Since these items are not sold or placed on the market, they do not require environmental information labeling.

The “Classification Notes” explain what constitutes electronic information products.

Products in the “Catalogue” are only a subset of those listed in the Classification Notes. They are products known to contain lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, PBB, and PBDE. Not all products in the Classification Notes are included in the Catalogue.

Generally, there is no difference in strictness between national standards and industry standards.

If an industry standard is issued before a national standard, enterprises should follow the industry standard. Once the national standard is issued, the industry standard becomes invalid.

If an industry standard is issued after a national standard, it usually serves as a supplement, and both may be applied together.

In the initial stage of implementation, the Measures only require voluntary self-declaration of hazardous substance information, so testing and certification are not mandatory and do not involve mutual recognition issues.

In the later stage, when compulsory CCC certification is introduced, mutual recognition may become relevant and depends on bilateral agreements between governments.

If such agreements exist between governments, certification from recognized foreign bodies will be accepted; otherwise, it will not be recognized.

Chapter 3 provides general penalty provisions for violations related to electronic information product pollution control but does not specify exact penalty amounts.

Enforcement is carried out by relevant authorities such as customs, industry and commerce, quality supervision, and environmental protection departments, each imposing penalties according to their respective regulations.

If a finished product is found non-compliant with the “Administrative Measures,” the manufacturer of the finished product is responsible, even if the issue originates from components.

The OEM manufacturer may trace responsibility back to suppliers.

If a component is sold as a standalone product and is found non-compliant, the component manufacturer is responsible.

If a complete product is found to be non-compliant with the provisions of the "Administrative Measures," the manufacturer of the complete product shall bear responsibility, even if the issue is caused by components. The responsibility of component suppliers should be traced by the complete product manufacturer. If components sold separately are found to be non-compliant, the component manufacturer shall bear responsibility.

After March 1, 2007, all electronic information products must disclose information such as hazardous substances, environmentally friendly use period, and recyclability in accordance with the "Administrative Measures" and relevant standards. Whether labeling is required and how complete products and components coordinate in marking are specified in the "Marking Requirements."

If a product is included in the "Catalog," its main components must comply with the "Administrative Measures" and relevant standards. However, whether both the complete product and its components must bear the CCC mark depends on which is included in the Catalog. If the complete product is included, only the complete product needs the CCC mark.

The "Administrative Measures" is a legal regulatory document of mainland China. According to common practice, no official English version is provided. Many English translations are available online and can be used for reference. However, in case of discrepancies, the Chinese version shall prevail.

The "Administrative Measures" can be implemented with the support of relevant standards and the "Catalog." There are currently no plans to formulate detailed implementation rules, nor is there any information indicating that local authorities will issue their own rules.

According to the "Administrative Measures," after March 1, 2007, it is not permitted to lease electronic information products manufactured after the effective date that have not disclosed required information or, if listed in the "Catalog," have not obtained CCC certification.

Consideration has already been given to referencing customs codes when formulating the "Catalog" in the future.

If an overseas parent company sells products to a subsidiary in mainland China that has a separate legal entity, the requirements of the "Administrative Measures" must be met. If the products are transferred to a branch with the same legal entity, this is considered an internal asset transfer rather than "placing on the market," and compliance is not required.

According to the Basic Laws of the Hong Kong and Macau Special Administrative Regions, the "Administrative Measures" do not apply to these regions. However, electronic information products manufactured in Hong Kong or Macau and sold in mainland China must comply with the relevant requirements.

“Electrical and electronic equipment” refers to equipment and devices (including components and accessories) that operate using electric current or electromagnetic fields. In terms of product scope, Korea RoHS aligns with the existing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system. Article 6 of the Enforcement Ordinance lists applicable products. Therefore, companies can refer to this list to determine whether their products fall under “electrical and electronic equipment.”

“Vehicles” refer to those described in Article 2(1) of the Automobile Management Act (including components and accessories). This includes passenger cars, vans, and trucks under 3.5 tons.

Annex 2 of the Enforcement Ordinance lists materials and components exempt from hazardous substance concentration limits, and these exemption applications are expected to be similar to those under EU RoHS.

Article 6 of the Enforcement Ordinance states that semiconductors used as components of electrical and electronic equipment are included in the scope. However, exemptions may apply due to economic and technical considerations. Companies should therefore verify whether their products fall within scope when complying with Korea RoHS.

Medical products are not currently covered under Korea RoHS. They may be included in the future if the EPR scope expands, so continuous monitoring is required.

No. However, it should continue to be monitored because medical devices may be included in the future due to expansion of the EPR scope.

Industrial equipment or products are not included. Consumer products and some office equipment are currently covered under Korea RoHS. However, the regulatory scope is expected to expand, so continued monitoring is required.

If the product can also be used for purposes other than its main function, it is not included in the scope. If the product is only used for a designated function within a vehicle, then it is included in the scope.

The Act does not clearly specify this. However, discussions are ongoing regarding a legally permitted grace period, under which products placed on the market before a certain date may not be subject to obligations. Details of the grace period have not yet been announced. The approval of second-hand product usage is also under discussion, and a positive outcome is expected.

Regulations concerning batteries are governed by the “Quality Management and Safety Control of Industrial Products Act.”

In principle, EU RoHS covers finished products. The supply chain must comply with specific requirements for supplied parts, and the same principle applies under Korea RoHS.

Yes. Korea RoHS takes effect based on the application scope of the EPR system. However, the scope of electrical and electronic products is expected to expand.

Korea RoHS prohibits new electrical and electronic equipment placed on the Korean market from containing lead, cadmium, mercury, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs), and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) above the specified limits. For vehicles, the four heavy metals—lead, mercury, hexavalent chromium, and cadmium—are restricted. The regulated concentrations specified in Annex 1 of the Enforcement Ordinance are the same as those under EU RoHS and ELV.

No. Therefore, until standards are issued, analysis may follow internationally recognized methods. The standards are expected to align with EU RoHS.

Korea RoHS does not cover packaging materials. There is a separate law in Korea regulating packaging materials.

The “recycling performance rate” refers to the target rate considered during product design, while the “recycling rate” refers to the target rate that must be met during actual recycling processes. Both terms are defined in the Enforcement Ordinance and Enforcement Regulations for each product.

The target recycling (performance) rate is determined based on industrial technical considerations. It is calculated according to the methodology in Annex 3 of the Enforcement Regulations, reviewed by a committee, and published before the relevant year begins. The target rate varies by year and product, and must be checked in the Enforcement Ordinance and Enforcement Regulations for each case.

The guidance explains in detail how to achieve recycling targets through improved materials and structural design. It includes the use of recyclable materials, simplification of materials, material identification markings, and ease of disassembly.

Manufacturers and/or importers may either directly recycle collected waste or join a recycling cooperative organization to fulfill their obligations.

A designated fee is calculated based on recycling costs. The calculation standards and payment procedures are defined by the organization’s regulations.

Manufacturers, importers of electrical and electronic equipment, or recycling cooperative organizations must submit a “Recycling Requirement Implementation Plan” to the environmental authority for approval. After the plan is approved, manufacturers or importers must submit a “Recycling Requirement Implementation Report” to the environmental authority. The submission process for the “Recycling Requirement Implementation Plan” is specified in Article 14 of the Enforcement Ordinance, and the submission process for the “Recycling Requirement Implementation Report” is specified in Article 16.

Manufacturers and importers of electrical and electronic equipment and vehicles must issue a self-declaration stating compliance with hazardous substance concentration limits or product recycling rates. The declaration procedure requires disclosure of operating and management systems and company website information. Details are specified in Annex 1 of the Enforcement Ordinance. There is no mandatory certification process; however, non-compliant manufacturers and importers may be subject to penalties such as imprisonment or fines.

In principle, each product requires a declaration. However, products with similar specifications or versions may be combined into a single declaration. In such cases, all product model numbers must be listed in the declaration.

There is no mandatory requirement for labeling. Manufacturers and importers follow voluntary verification and declaration practices.

Recycling performance records must be retained for five years from the most recent record. They should be archived by year.

Supervisory management is implemented by the Korea Environment & Resources Corporation, and detailed procedures are still under discussion.

Korea RoHS took effect on January 1, 2008.

Korea RoHS applies to products placed on the market or imported after January 1, 2008. However, considering industry requests, it is still under discussion whether the regulation should be based on the manufacturing date.

The Act passed parliamentary review in April 2007. Public consultation on the Enforcement Ordinance and Enforcement Regulations was ongoing in September 2007. The publication was scheduled for October or November 2007 depending on discussions among ministries and government agencies.

As these are official Korean legal documents, the Korean government does not publish official English versions. Eco Frontier publishes a free English version of the Act and paid English versions of the Enforcement Ordinance and Enforcement Regulations.

Before 1 January 2021, you may use the CE marking or other appropriate markings (e.g., wheel mark or Pi mark). Most CE-marked products could continue to be sold until 31 December 2021. However, if EU regulations change during this period, CE marking may no longer be accepted in the UK before 31 December 2021 (products must comply with UKCA marking requirements).

UKCA marking may be used from 1 January 2021. However, to allow businesses time to adapt, CE marking is still generally permitted until 1 January 2022 in most cases.

If your product meets the following conditions, UKCA marking must be used from 1 January 2021:

• The product is placed on the UK market
• It is covered by legislation requiring UKCA marking
• The product is subject to mandatory conformity assessment by a third-party Notified Body
• The conformity assessment is conducted by a UK conformity assessment body, and the documentation has not been transferred to an EU-recognised body before 1 January 2021

Note: Existing stock is exempt. For example, products fully manufactured and ready to be placed on the market before 1 January 2021.

No. From 1 January 2021, if a manufacturer wants to place products on the UK market, they must appoint (or choose to appoint) an authorised representative or responsible person based in the UK.

UKCA marking applies to England, Wales, and Scotland, but not Northern Ireland. Products in Northern Ireland require CE marking or the UK (NI) marking.

• If resizing the UKCA mark, it must be scaled proportionally
• The UKCA mark must be at least 5mm in height, unless otherwise specified by regulations
• The UKCA mark must be clearly visible (from 1 January 2023, it must be permanently affixed to the product)

Download UKCA mark image files (fill) (ZIP, 818KB)

Download UKCA mark image files (outline) (ZIP, 2.03MB)

Before 1 January 2023, for most goods (except those subject to special rules), the UKCA mark may be affixed as a label on the product or accompanying documentation. From 1 January 2023, in most cases, the UKCA mark must be permanently applied directly to the product.

The content required for the UK Declaration of Conformity (DoC) is the same as the CE DoC. However, it is important to note that applicable regulations and referenced standards are UK-based rather than EU-based.

According to current UK government guidance, you may continue to use the CE marking for products placed on the UK market until 1 January 2022.